Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

China

Alibaba.com’s Hazy Revenue Outlook

The new chief executive of Alibaba.com held his first conference call with reporters on Thursday – and left listeners scratching their heads when his remarks about the company’s revenue forecast didn’t seem to add up. Jonathan Lu took his post at Alibaba.com, which operates websites that connect buyers and suppliers, after former CEO David Wei resigned following a fraud scandal in February. Mr. Lu was thus handed the weighty task of rebuilding the company’s credibility and guiding it through an in-progress business transition, entailing a new focus on boosting revenue per user rather than raising the raw user numbers that have fueled growth in recent years. Mr. Lu, who is also CEO of Alibaba.com’s sister company Taobao , an online shopping website, made a quiet debut as Mr. Wei’s replacement. Having just taken the job, he didn’t speak to reporters in March after Alibaba.com announced a set of financial results. He participated in a call with analysts that reporters were allowed to listen in on, but left most of the talking to Chief Financial Officer Maggie Wu. Alibaba.com declined to make him available for interviews. Two months later, during Thursday’s conference call on the company’s first-quarter financial results, Mr. Lu seemed more comfortable speaking about the company. But his remarks on revenue growth quickly became a source of confusion. “We forecast that basically, it’s possible the growth rate of 2011 revenue—overall revenue, may be about the same as 2010, flat,” he said early in the call, speaking in Chinese. He proceeded to emphasize he meant “revenue” and not “revenue growth” would be flat. The comment came as something of shock given the company’s recent results. Alibaba.com notched revenue growth of 29% in 2009 and 43% in 2010. But in response to a later question, Mr. Lu said revenue growth for the rest of the year would be “about the same” as the 25.5% growth Alibaba.com logged in the first quarter – hardly flat growth even by China’s high-octane standards. When asked to clarify, Mr. Lu gave a more noncommittal answer: “This year’s revenue will still grow, but the growth will be relatively mild… Overall, 2011 revenue will have some growth compared to 2010.” After the call, the company was quick to send a clarification statement, but it also seemed to differ slightly from the earlier remarks. “We expect revenue to grow, but the rate will not be the same as in the previous years. The view of the revenue for coming quarters would be relatively flat compared to Q1, but it will represent continued growth from 2010,” the statement said. While the conflicting statements seem to be the result of a simple miscommunication, the confusion highlights the size of the challenges Mr. Lu may be facing as the head of both Alibaba.com and Taobao. Mr. Lu’s background differs substantially from that of his predecessor. Mr. Wei, who spoke English on results conference calls and often accepted interviews . Mr. Wei had been chief financial officer and president of Kingfisher PLC’s home-improvement retailer, B&Q China, and worked at other large companies, including PricewaterhouseCoopers, before joining Alibaba.com. That big-company resume contrasts with the more entrepreneurial background of Mr. Lu, who was a lobby manager at a hotel before he started his career in technology by co-founding a network-communication company. Mr. Lu’s conference call isn’t the only communications breakdown to be associated with the Alibaba name. Yahoo, which owns a roughly 40% stake in Alibaba.com parent Alibaba Group, revealed earlier this week that the Chinese company had transferred ownership of an online-payment unit to a separate entity controlled by Alibaba Group Chief Executive Jack Ma. Yahoo said Thursday it was notified of the move on March 31 – seven months after it was completed, without the knowledge or approval of Alibaba’s board or shareholders. Alibaba said it moved ownership of the unit, Alipay, in response to rules issued last year by China’s central bank that could potentially bar foreigners from owning controlling stakes in Chinese Internet-payment services. – Owen Fletcher. Follow him on Twitter @owenfletcher

Published

on

The new chief executive of Alibaba.com held his first conference call with reporters on Thursday – and left listeners scratching their heads when his remarks about the company’s revenue forecast didn’t seem to add up. Jonathan Lu took his post at Alibaba.com, which operates websites that connect buyers and suppliers, after former CEO David Wei resigned following a fraud scandal in February. Mr. Lu was thus handed the weighty task of rebuilding the company’s credibility and guiding it through an in-progress business transition, entailing a new focus on boosting revenue per user rather than raising the raw user numbers that have fueled growth in recent years. Mr. Lu, who is also CEO of Alibaba.com’s sister company Taobao , an online shopping website, made a quiet debut as Mr. Wei’s replacement. Having just taken the job, he didn’t speak to reporters in March after Alibaba.com announced a set of financial results. He participated in a call with analysts that reporters were allowed to listen in on, but left most of the talking to Chief Financial Officer Maggie Wu. Alibaba.com declined to make him available for interviews. Two months later, during Thursday’s conference call on the company’s first-quarter financial results, Mr. Lu seemed more comfortable speaking about the company. But his remarks on revenue growth quickly became a source of confusion. “We forecast that basically, it’s possible the growth rate of 2011 revenue—overall revenue, may be about the same as 2010, flat,” he said early in the call, speaking in Chinese. He proceeded to emphasize he meant “revenue” and not “revenue growth” would be flat. The comment came as something of shock given the company’s recent results. Alibaba.com notched revenue growth of 29% in 2009 and 43% in 2010. But in response to a later question, Mr. Lu said revenue growth for the rest of the year would be “about the same” as the 25.5% growth Alibaba.com logged in the first quarter – hardly flat growth even by China’s high-octane standards. When asked to clarify, Mr. Lu gave a more noncommittal answer: “This year’s revenue will still grow, but the growth will be relatively mild… Overall, 2011 revenue will have some growth compared to 2010.” After the call, the company was quick to send a clarification statement, but it also seemed to differ slightly from the earlier remarks. “We expect revenue to grow, but the rate will not be the same as in the previous years. The view of the revenue for coming quarters would be relatively flat compared to Q1, but it will represent continued growth from 2010,” the statement said. While the conflicting statements seem to be the result of a simple miscommunication, the confusion highlights the size of the challenges Mr. Lu may be facing as the head of both Alibaba.com and Taobao. Mr. Lu’s background differs substantially from that of his predecessor. Mr. Wei, who spoke English on results conference calls and often accepted interviews . Mr. Wei had been chief financial officer and president of Kingfisher PLC’s home-improvement retailer, B&Q China, and worked at other large companies, including PricewaterhouseCoopers, before joining Alibaba.com. That big-company resume contrasts with the more entrepreneurial background of Mr. Lu, who was a lobby manager at a hotel before he started his career in technology by co-founding a network-communication company. Mr. Lu’s conference call isn’t the only communications breakdown to be associated with the Alibaba name. Yahoo, which owns a roughly 40% stake in Alibaba.com parent Alibaba Group, revealed earlier this week that the Chinese company had transferred ownership of an online-payment unit to a separate entity controlled by Alibaba Group Chief Executive Jack Ma. Yahoo said Thursday it was notified of the move on March 31 – seven months after it was completed, without the knowledge or approval of Alibaba’s board or shareholders. Alibaba said it moved ownership of the unit, Alipay, in response to rules issued last year by China’s central bank that could potentially bar foreigners from owning controlling stakes in Chinese Internet-payment services. – Owen Fletcher. Follow him on Twitter @owenfletcher

The rest is here:
Alibaba.com’s Hazy Revenue Outlook

China

Exploring the Revamped China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) Program: Potential Benefits for International Businesses

Published

on

Companies in China must navigate compliance, trading, and reporting within the CCER framework, impacting operations and strategic objectives. The program focuses on afforestation, solar, wind power, and mangrove creation, offering opportunities for innovation and revenue streams while ensuring transparency and accuracy. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment oversees the program.


As companies navigate the complexities of compliance, trading, and reporting within the CCER framework, they must also contend with the broader implications for their operations, finances, and strategic objectives.

This article explores the multifaceted impact of the CCER program on companies operating in China, examining both the opportunities for innovation and growth, as well as the potential risks and compliance considerations.

Initially, the CCER will focus on four sectors: afforestation, solar thermal power, offshore wind power, and mangrove vegetation creation. Companies operating within these sectors can register their accredited carbon reduction credits in the CCER system for trading purposes. These sectors were chosen due to their reliance on carbon credit sales for profitability. For instance, offshore wind power generation, as more costly than onshore alternatives, stands to benefit from additional revenue streams facilitated by CCER transactions.

Currently, primary buyers are expected to be high-emission enterprises seeking to offset their excess emissions and companies aiming to demonstrate corporate social responsibility by contributing to environmental conservation. Eventually, the program aims to allow individuals to purchase credits to offset their carbon footprints. Unlike the mandatory national ETS, the revamped CCER scheme permits any enterprise to buy carbon credits, thereby expanding the market scope.

The Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) oversees the CCER program, having assumed responsibility for climate change initiatives from the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) in 2018. Verification agencies and project operators are mandated to ensure transparency and accuracy in disclosing project details and carbon reduction practices.

On the second day after the launch on January 23, the first transaction in China’s voluntary carbon market saw the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), the country’s largest offshore oil and gas producer, purchase 250,000 tons of carbon credits to offset its emissions.

This article is republished from China Briefing. Read the rest of the original article.

China Briefing is written and produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The practice assists foreign investors into China and has done since 1992 through offices in Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian, Qingdao, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong. Please contact the firm for assistance in China at china@dezshira.com.

Continue Reading

China

China Implements New Policies to Boost Foreign Investment in Science and Technology Companies

Published

on

China’s Ministry of Commerce announced new policy measures on April 19, 2023, to encourage foreign investment in the technology sector. The measures include facilitating bond issuance, improving the investment environment, and simplifying procedures for foreign institutions to access the Chinese market.


On April 19, 2023, China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) along with nine other departments announced a new set of policy measures (hereinafter, “new measures”) aimed at encouraging foreign investment in its technology sector.

Among the new measures, China intends to facilitate the issuance of RMB bonds by eligible overseas institutions and encourage both domestic and foreign-invested tech companies to raise funds through bond issuance.

In this article, we offer an overview of the new measures and their broader significance in fostering international investment and driving innovation-driven growth, underscoring China’s efforts to instill confidence among foreign investors.

The new measures contain a total of sixteen points aimed at facilitating foreign investment in China’s technology sector and improving the overall investment environment.

Divided into four main chapters, the new measures address key aspects including:

Firstly, China aims to expedite the approval process for QFII and RQFII, ensuring efficient access to the Chinese market. Moreover, the government promises to simplify procedures, facilitating operational activities and fund management for foreign institutions.

This article is republished from China Briefing. Read the rest of the original article.

China Briefing is written and produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The practice assists foreign investors into China and has done since 1992 through offices in Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian, Qingdao, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong. Please contact the firm for assistance in China at china@dezshira.com.

Continue Reading

China

Q1 2024 Brief on Transfer Pricing in Asia

Published

on

Indonesia’s Ministry of Finance released Regulation No. 172 of 2023 on transfer pricing, consolidating various guidelines. The Directorate General of Taxes focuses on compliance, expanded arm’s length principle, and substance checks. Singapore’s Budget 2024 addresses economic challenges, operational costs, and sustainability, implementing global tax reforms like the Income Inclusion Rule and Domestic Top-up Tax.


Indonesia’s Ministry of Finance (MoF) has released Regulation No. 172 of 2023 (“PMK-172”), which prevails as a unified transfer pricing guideline. PMK-172 consolidates various transfer pricing matters that were previously covered under separate regulations, including the application of the arm’s length principle, transfer pricing documentation requirements, transfer pricing adjustments, Mutual Agreement Procedure (“MAP”), and Advance Pricing Agreements (“APA”).

The Indonesian Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) has continued to focus on compliance with the ex-ante principle, the expanded scope of transactions subject to the arm’s length principle, and the reinforcement of substance checks as part of the preliminary stage, indicating the DGT’s expectation of meticulous and well-supported transfer pricing analyses conducted by taxpayers.

In conclusion, PMK-172 reflects the Indonesian government’s commitment to addressing some of the most controversial transfer pricing issues and promoting clarity and certainty. While it brings new opportunities, it also presents challenges. Taxpayers are strongly advised to evaluate the implications of these new guidelines on their businesses in Indonesia to navigate this transformative regulatory landscape successfully.

In a significant move to bolster economic resilience and sustainability, Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Mr. Lawrence Wong, unveiled the ambitious Singapore Budget 2024 on February 16, 2024. Amidst global economic fluctuations and a pressing climate crisis, the Budget strategically addresses the dual challenges of rising operational costs and the imperative for sustainable development, marking a pivotal step towards fortifying Singapore’s position as a competitive and green economy.

In anticipation of global tax reforms, Singapore’s proactive steps to implement the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and Domestic Top-up Tax (DTT) under the BEPS 2.0 framework demonstrate a forward-looking approach to ensure tax compliance and fairness. These measures reaffirm Singapore’s commitment to international tax standards while safeguarding its economic interests.

Transfer pricing highlights from the Singapore Budget 2024 include:

This article is republished from China Briefing. Read the rest of the original article.

China Briefing is written and produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The practice assists foreign investors into China and has done since 1992 through offices in Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian, Qingdao, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong. Please contact the firm for assistance in China at china@dezshira.com.

Continue Reading