Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Trade

The end of global supply chains as we know them?

Published

on

Chinese workers manufacture makeup brushes on an assembly line at a plant in Luyi county, Zhoukou city, central China

Author: Davin Chor, Dartmouth College

‘It’s the end of the world as we know it’. So rings the lyrics of a classic song from the mid-1980s by the rock band R.E.M. These words aptly capture the foreboding sentiment gripping manufacturing companies that rely on global supply chains as they scramble to cope with the fallout from the ongoing tariff war between the United States and China.

Prior to 2016, the world was accustomed to low barriers to trade. Tariffs on manufactured goods — including parts and components or goods-in-process — declined steadily for decades as more countries joined the WTO and more regional trade agreements were signed. The arrival of modern communications technology and the falling costs of air travel enabled companies to cast a wider net when identifying overseas suppliers. This expanded the range of inputs — even relatively specialised ones — that they could reliably source from abroad.

Manufacturing firms took advantage of this business environment and fragmented their production chains across country borders, motivated by forces such as low labour costs and proximity to key markets. China was of course one of the biggest beneficiaries, with its deep integration in global supply chains being a major driver of its export boom.

The US–China tariff war threw a significant spanner in the works. When the initial tariff salvos were fired in 2018, most firms remained optimistic. But fast forward to mid-2019, as the positions of both the United States and China have hardened, and now firms are convinced of the ominous realisation that these tariffs are here to stay. The intent of the current US administration appears to be the ‘decoupling’ of the economies of the United States and China. In other words, global supply chains aren’t just collateral damage in this tariff war. They are instead a prime target, with the current administration seemingly keen to reduce the US dependence on China as a trade and supply chain partner.

Already, 2019 is poised to be a very bad year for US–China trade flows. According to the US Census Bureau, the value of US imports from China has dropped significantly (more than 9 per cent) on a year-on-year basis for every single month so far for which data is available. The largest drop was in March — the value of imports decreased from US$38.3 million to US$31 million, an 18.7 per cent change from 2018. While the ongoing disruption to supply chains between the United States and China is likely to account for a good portion of this decline, a fuller accounting exercise will have to await more in-depth research.

Supply chain professionals are now scrambling. Some are rushing to get their companies’ orders in to try and beat the implementation dates of key tariffs. Others are searching for alternative sources of inputs outside of China, as a first step in a broader re-organisation of their supply chain strategies. These changes are easier in theory than in practice — suppliers outside of China, such as Vietnam, reportedly lack the capacity to accommodate the sudden rise in demand that they now face. Small-business manufacturers and major brand-name firms alike are being affected.

What does this all mean for the future of global supply chains? Some may see the tariff actions of the past two years as mere bumps in the road. Once cooler heads prevail, so will the old state of affairs. But this optimistic view downplays the potential long-term repercussions of the trade war.

Recent developments may hasten the erosion of China’s supply chain competitiveness in labour-intensive industries such as textiles, apparel, footwear and toys. Even before 2016, rising labour costs and concerns about product quality were already affecting China’s attractiveness as a manufacturing location in these industries. The tariff war is only reinforcing these concerns. This in itself may not be the worst development — it presents an opportunity for China to double down on restructuring its economy and shift even more aggressively into higher-end manufacturing activities in electronics, semiconductors or telecommunications equipment.

In the short-run though, Chinese workers caught in this structural transition are likely to experience some pain. The slowdown in China’s exports between 2013–2016 was accompanied by a rise in labour strikes, which quickly drew the attention of Chinese authorities concerned about social stability. With these ongoing tariff wars, economic dislocation and the impact on workers as supply chain orders dry up will have to be…

Source link

Continue Reading

Trade

Fixing fragmentation in the settlement of international trade disputes

Published

on

Fragmentation in global trade due to the lack of development in multilateral trade rules at the WTO has led to an increase in FTAs. The Appellate Body impasse has further exacerbated fragmentation, requiring a multilateral approach for reform.

Fragmentation in Global Trade

Fragmentation in global trade is not new. With the slow development of multilateral trade rules at the World Trade Organization (WTO), governments have turned to free trade agreements (FTAs). As of 2023, almost 600 bilateral and regional trade agreements have been notified to the WTO, leading to growing fragmentation in trade rules, business activities, and international relations. But until recently, trade dispute settlements have predominantly remained within the WTO.

Challenges with WTO Dispute Settlement

The demise of the Appellate Body increased fragmentation in both the interpretation and enforcement of trade law. A small number of WTO Members created the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) as a temporary solution, but in its current form, it cannot properly address fragmentation. Since its creation in 2020, the MPIA has only attracted 26 parties, and its rulings have not been consistent with previous decisions made by the Appellate Body, rendering WTO case law increasingly fragmented.

The Path Forward for Global Trade

Maintaining the integrity and predictability of the global trading system while reducing fragmentation requires restoring the WTO’s authority. At the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference in 2022, governments agreed to re-establish a functional dispute settlement system by 2024. Reaching a consensus will be difficult, and negotiations will take time. A critical mass-based, open plurilateral approach provides a viable alternative way to reform the appellate mechanism, as WTO Members are committed to reforming the dispute settlement system.

Source : Fixing fragmentation in the settlement of international trade disputes

Continue Reading

Trade

WTO ministerial trading in low expectations and high stakes

Published

on

The WTO’s 13th Ministerial Conference is set to focus on e-commerce transparency, investment facilitation, and admitting new members. However, progress may be hindered by disputes, especially regarding fisheries subsidies.

The World Trade Organisation’s 13th Ministerial Conference

The World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) 13th Ministerial Conference is set to take place in Abu Dhabi on 26–29 February, with expectations of deals on electronic commerce transparency, investment facilitation for development, and the admission of Timor Leste and the Comoros as WTO members. Despite these positive developments, the expectations are relatively modest compared to promises made at the 12th Ministerial Conference, which included addressing fisheries subsidies and restoring a fully functioning dispute settlement mechanism by 2024.

Challenges in Dispute Settlement and Agricultural Trade Reform

However, challenges remain, especially in the deadlock of dispute settlement since December 2019 due to a US veto on the appointment of Appellate Body judges. Progress in restoring the dispute settlement mechanism has stalled, and discord continues regarding India’s grain stockholding policy as a potential illegal subsidy. Restoring a fully functioning dispute settlement mechanism hinges on addressing US concerns about perceived bias against trade remedies in relation to China’s state subsidies.

Geopolitical Tensions and the Future of Trade Relations

The likelihood of reaching agreements amid geopolitical tensions between Western democracies and China appears slim, with issues surrounding subsidies and global supply chains causing rifts in trade relations. As nations focus on self-reliance within the global value chain, opportunities for trading face obstacles. Advocacy for open markets and addressing protectionist sentiments remains crucial for fostering resilience to external shocks and promoting economic growth.

Source : WTO ministerial trading in low expectations and high stakes

Continue Reading

Trade

Getting Vietnam’s economic growth back on track

Published

on

Vietnam’s economy grew 8% in 2022 but slowed in 2023 due to falling exports and delays in public investments. The economy’s future depends on structural reforms and reducing dependency on foreign investment.

Vietnam’s Economic Roller Coaster

After emerging from COVID-19 with an 8 per cent annual growth rate, Vietnam’s economy took a downturn in the first half of 2023. The drop was attributed to falling exports due to monetary tightening in developed countries and a slow post-pandemic recovery in China.

Trade Performance and Monetary Policy

Exports were down 12 per cent on-year, with the industrial production index showing negative growth early in 2023 but ended with an increase of approximately 1 per cent for the year. Monetary policy was loosened throughout the year, with bank credit growing by 13.5 per cent overall and 1.7 per cent in the last 20 days of 2023.

Challenges and Prospects

Vietnam’s economy suffered from delayed public investments, electricity shortages, and a declining domestic private sector in the last two years. Looking ahead to 2024, economic growth is expected to be in the range of 5.5–6 per cent, but the country faces uncertainties due to geopolitical tensions and global economic conditions.

Source : Getting Vietnam’s economic growth back on track

Continue Reading