Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Trade

AHKFTA marks new trade potential for Indonesia

Published

on

A port worker watches as a ship leaves the New Priok Container Terminal 1 in North Jakarta, Indonesia 13 September, 2016 (Photo: Reuters/Darren Whiteside).

Authors: Nopriyanto Hady Suhanda and M Ridho Mubaroq, Ministry of Finance, Indonesia

In the first week of July 2020, Indonesia and Hong Kong entered a new phase of economic cooperation. Indonesia finally joined other ASEAN member countries in ratifying the ASEAN–Hong Kong, China Free Trade Area (AHKFTA).

The agreement significantly reduces trade barriers between the two, boosting exchange in goods and services. Indonesia’s ratification follows seven other ASEAN member countries and comes three years after Indonesia signed the agreement in 2017.

By ratifying the deal, Indonesia has committed to eliminating customs duties on about 75 per cent of its tariff lines within 10 years and reducing customs duties on a further 10 per cent of its tariff lines within 14 years. The tariff reductions cover a range of Hong Kong commodities including jewellery, clothing and accessories, watches and clocks, and toys. Hong Kong will grant tariff-free access to all products originating from ASEAN member states, including Indonesia, once the free trade agreement (FTA) is effective. Indonesia’s trade ministry anticipates that the export of luxury items to Hong Kong, such as edible swiftlet nests and tobacco products, as well as communication and electronic equipment, will enjoy a strong kick.

The AHKFTA is the sixth FTA between the ASEAN block and external partners, after agreements with China, South Korea, Japan, India and Australia–New Zealand. Such arrangements have successfully boosted Indonesia’s total trade volume with those counterparts.

Indonesia’s imports from China and South Korea have increased significantly since 2010, after joining the ASEAN–China FTA and the ASEAN–Korea FTA. Indonesia’s exports have remained sluggish, however, especially to South Korea and Australia. Some might argue that this demonstrates the ineffectiveness of FTAs — but the overall picture is more nuanced than the ‘exports are good, imports are bad’ trope.

According to CSIS Indonesia, FTAs between Indonesia and its major partners have allowed participants to become more specialised and efficient producers. This is due to the economic shift these FTAs initiate towards a more natural pattern of trade that reflects comparative advantage. Such efficiency increases economic welfare among the participating countries.

This study also found that production networks in Southeast Asia are heavily reliant on parts and components being imported to manufacture export goods. This is another reason to move beyond the mercantilist trope.

The AHKFTA is expected to have Indonesia more involved in these global value chains (GVCs), magnifying the positive growth, employment and distributional impacts of standard trade through boosting domestic productivity, capacity and employment. The World Bank found that companies in developing countries involved in GVCs are twice as productive as those that aren’t. In addition, ‘a one per cent increase in GVC participation is estimated to boost per capita income by more than one per cent, or much more than the 0.2 per cent income gain from standard trade’, says the World Bank.

A clear integrated strategy by Indonesia in utilising the AHKFTA to boost trade and inclusion in GVCs is key. The government must work hand in hand with stakeholders, particularly the private sector, to deliver better information and assistance that helps companies export more of their products into newly opened markets.

Looking ahead, clearer regulations and simplified licensing will create a more conducive and enabling Indonesian business environment. Paying careful attention to improving the capacity of domestic industry in preparing for an increased involvement in GVCs — that key opportunity emphasised by this agreement— is also essential. Taking a longer-term view, a regular review of the trade agreement would ensure progress is tracked against goals.

Hong Kong’s economy is shrinking this year, mainly due to local unrest and the COVID-19 pandemic. Making matters worse, US President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order revoking preferential economic treatment for Hong Kong, nominally in response to China’s enactment of a new national security law. All this uncertainty will likely reduce the impact expected of the AHKFTA for Indonesia.

The adoption of this trade deal suggests that stronger trade and financial roles for Indonesian officials in Hong Kong would be especially useful. Representatives acting as market analysts and ‘trade intelligentsia’ to seek out opportunities to elevate trade will be…

Source link

Continue Reading

Trade

Fixing fragmentation in the settlement of international trade disputes

Published

on

Fragmentation in global trade due to the lack of development in multilateral trade rules at the WTO has led to an increase in FTAs. The Appellate Body impasse has further exacerbated fragmentation, requiring a multilateral approach for reform.

Fragmentation in Global Trade

Fragmentation in global trade is not new. With the slow development of multilateral trade rules at the World Trade Organization (WTO), governments have turned to free trade agreements (FTAs). As of 2023, almost 600 bilateral and regional trade agreements have been notified to the WTO, leading to growing fragmentation in trade rules, business activities, and international relations. But until recently, trade dispute settlements have predominantly remained within the WTO.

Challenges with WTO Dispute Settlement

The demise of the Appellate Body increased fragmentation in both the interpretation and enforcement of trade law. A small number of WTO Members created the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) as a temporary solution, but in its current form, it cannot properly address fragmentation. Since its creation in 2020, the MPIA has only attracted 26 parties, and its rulings have not been consistent with previous decisions made by the Appellate Body, rendering WTO case law increasingly fragmented.

The Path Forward for Global Trade

Maintaining the integrity and predictability of the global trading system while reducing fragmentation requires restoring the WTO’s authority. At the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference in 2022, governments agreed to re-establish a functional dispute settlement system by 2024. Reaching a consensus will be difficult, and negotiations will take time. A critical mass-based, open plurilateral approach provides a viable alternative way to reform the appellate mechanism, as WTO Members are committed to reforming the dispute settlement system.

Source : Fixing fragmentation in the settlement of international trade disputes

Continue Reading

Trade

WTO ministerial trading in low expectations and high stakes

Published

on

The WTO’s 13th Ministerial Conference is set to focus on e-commerce transparency, investment facilitation, and admitting new members. However, progress may be hindered by disputes, especially regarding fisheries subsidies.

The World Trade Organisation’s 13th Ministerial Conference

The World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) 13th Ministerial Conference is set to take place in Abu Dhabi on 26–29 February, with expectations of deals on electronic commerce transparency, investment facilitation for development, and the admission of Timor Leste and the Comoros as WTO members. Despite these positive developments, the expectations are relatively modest compared to promises made at the 12th Ministerial Conference, which included addressing fisheries subsidies and restoring a fully functioning dispute settlement mechanism by 2024.

Challenges in Dispute Settlement and Agricultural Trade Reform

However, challenges remain, especially in the deadlock of dispute settlement since December 2019 due to a US veto on the appointment of Appellate Body judges. Progress in restoring the dispute settlement mechanism has stalled, and discord continues regarding India’s grain stockholding policy as a potential illegal subsidy. Restoring a fully functioning dispute settlement mechanism hinges on addressing US concerns about perceived bias against trade remedies in relation to China’s state subsidies.

Geopolitical Tensions and the Future of Trade Relations

The likelihood of reaching agreements amid geopolitical tensions between Western democracies and China appears slim, with issues surrounding subsidies and global supply chains causing rifts in trade relations. As nations focus on self-reliance within the global value chain, opportunities for trading face obstacles. Advocacy for open markets and addressing protectionist sentiments remains crucial for fostering resilience to external shocks and promoting economic growth.

Source : WTO ministerial trading in low expectations and high stakes

Continue Reading

Trade

Getting Vietnam’s economic growth back on track

Published

on

Vietnam’s economy grew 8% in 2022 but slowed in 2023 due to falling exports and delays in public investments. The economy’s future depends on structural reforms and reducing dependency on foreign investment.

Vietnam’s Economic Roller Coaster

After emerging from COVID-19 with an 8 per cent annual growth rate, Vietnam’s economy took a downturn in the first half of 2023. The drop was attributed to falling exports due to monetary tightening in developed countries and a slow post-pandemic recovery in China.

Trade Performance and Monetary Policy

Exports were down 12 per cent on-year, with the industrial production index showing negative growth early in 2023 but ended with an increase of approximately 1 per cent for the year. Monetary policy was loosened throughout the year, with bank credit growing by 13.5 per cent overall and 1.7 per cent in the last 20 days of 2023.

Challenges and Prospects

Vietnam’s economy suffered from delayed public investments, electricity shortages, and a declining domestic private sector in the last two years. Looking ahead to 2024, economic growth is expected to be in the range of 5.5–6 per cent, but the country faces uncertainties due to geopolitical tensions and global economic conditions.

Source : Getting Vietnam’s economic growth back on track

Continue Reading