Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Asean

China: will 2012 be a replay of 2009?

Author: Yiping Huang, Peking University China’s economic developments in 2011 closely resembled those of 2008: over-heating at the beginning of the year; moderating due to policy tightening around mid-year; and decelerating as a result of external recession before year’s end. But 2012 will probably not be a replay of 2009, as neither a hard landing nor a sharp rebound look likely this year. GDP growth may slow from 9.1 per cent in 2011 to 8.1 per cent in 2012 — with softer external demand and weaker residential investment — and inflation could ease from 5.5 per cent to 3.2 per cent. Consumption will probably play a greater role in the coming year, and both monetary and fiscal policy should be modestly expansionary. Key risks for China include deeper recession of the world economy and a disorderly correction of the housing market. Currently, China is suffering from a range of economic difficulties, which have fuelled fears of a hard landing. For instance, the number of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) declaring bankruptcy is growing rapidly, with several high-profile cases widely reported in the media. The flow of funds into private lending has been disrupted in certain areas. House prices declined for a third month in November, with potentially significant implications for investment growth and asset quality. Local government investment vehicles, with total liabilities of at least 10.7 trillion yuan (US$1.7 trillion), find it difficult to repay loans when they are due. And the recent expansion of shadow banking transactions may also cause risks for the financial system. But these factors are unlikely lead to a hard landing of the Chinese economy for at least three reasons. First, the changes have mainly been caused by policy adjustments, such as macro-policy tightening and housing restrictions. Some changes, such as the correction of property prices, may be necessary in order to facilitate healthy development in the future. If the situation deteriorates sharply, the government should be able to reverse the policies quickly. Second, these problems have not yet developed into systemic macro risks. Despite an increasing incidence of bankruptcy, for instance, the SME sector as a whole is still growing steadily. Also, the widely reported collapse of private lending activities remain isolated, concentrated largely in Wenzhou city of Zhejiang and Eerduosi city of Inner Mongolia. And third, balance sheets are still quite healthy for households, banks and the government — which should underwrite resilience even if the economic situation deteriorates. Total household borrowing is below 18 per cent of GDP, less than the value of households’ annual savings. If property prices decline modestly, households will not be forced to deleverage. And given the banks’ average non-performing loan ratio is at 2 per cent and the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) is at 21 per cent, some deterioration of credit quality is unlikely to make the banks dysfunctional in the near future. Finally, public debts are only 17 per cent of GDP in China. If all contingent liabilities are included, they could amount to nearly 70 per cent of GDP. But the government still has room to use fiscal resources to contain domestic risks and support economic growth. So based on current trends, 2012 should see a soft landing in China. Affected by a sluggish external economic environment, export and import growth will likely halve to 9.8 per cent and 12.8 per cent, respectively. Reduction in net exports could reduce GDP by 0.4 percentage points. Of the three key components of fixed-asset investment, manufacturing investment is relatively more resilient and infrastructure is more or less a function of government policy. Uncertainty surrounds residential investment, which is likely to slow significantly in the coming year, following sharp adjustment in both property prices and transaction volumes. Despite this, residential investment should continue to grow in 2012 — albeit at a slower pace — due to large development projects, ongoing construction and the expansion of public housing. Domestic consumption will be key to maintaining the economy, although the pace of its expansion should also moderate. In recent years, retail sales have consistently outperformed GDP. But the GDP-by-expenditure data continuously show declining consumption, due to reporting errors in household survey data, such as the under-reporting of income and household spending. Estimates combining information from both GDP by expenditure and retail sales suggest a turning point in 2007, after which consumption’s share of GDP actually picked up steadily. This is consistent with improvements in the social welfare system and a rapid growth of wage income in recent years. The authorities have become vigilant against downside risks, evidenced by the recent adjustment of the reserve requirement ratio. But policy makers are concerned about a premature and aggressive easing of policies, given what might be considered ‘overstimulation’ three years ago. Four more cuts to the RRR and a slight increase in fiscal deficit can also be expected throughout 2012. The purpose of RRR adjustment is to stabilise liquidity conditions, instead of stimulating growth, given the steady slowing of China’s money supply. Although a cut to the policy interest rate is not predicted, the chance of rate cuts could rise significantly if the global economy falls into deeper recession or the correction of the housing market becomes disorderly. Yiping Huang is Professor of Economics at Peking University and Professor at the China Economy Program , the Australian National University. He is also Chief Economist for Asia at Barclays Bank, Hong Kong. Russia and APEC 2012: imaginary engagement? Chinese leadership: The challenge in 2012 India faces an ugly environment in 2009

Published

on

Author: Yiping Huang, Peking University

China’s economic developments in 2011 closely resembled those of 2008: over-heating at the beginning of the year; moderating due to policy tightening around mid-year; and decelerating as a result of external recession before year’s end.

But 2012 will probably not be a replay of 2009, as neither a hard landing nor a sharp rebound look likely this year. GDP growth may slow from 9.1 per cent in 2011 to 8.1 per cent in 2012 — with softer external demand and weaker residential investment — and inflation could ease from 5.5 per cent to 3.2 per cent. Consumption will probably play a greater role in the coming year, and both monetary and fiscal policy should be modestly expansionary. Key risks for China include deeper recession of the world economy and a disorderly correction of the housing market.

Currently, China is suffering from a range of economic difficulties, which have fuelled fears of a hard landing. For instance, the number of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) declaring bankruptcy is growing rapidly, with several high-profile cases widely reported in the media. The flow of funds into private lending has been disrupted in certain areas. House prices declined for a third month in November, with potentially significant implications for investment growth and asset quality. Local government investment vehicles, with total liabilities of at least 10.7 trillion yuan (US$1.7 trillion), find it difficult to repay loans when they are due. And the recent expansion of shadow banking transactions may also cause risks for the financial system.

But these factors are unlikely lead to a hard landing of the Chinese economy for at least three reasons. First, the changes have mainly been caused by policy adjustments, such as macro-policy tightening and housing restrictions. Some changes, such as the correction of property prices, may be necessary in order to facilitate healthy development in the future. If the situation deteriorates sharply, the government should be able to reverse the policies quickly. Second, these problems have not yet developed into systemic macro risks. Despite an increasing incidence of bankruptcy, for instance, the SME sector as a whole is still growing steadily. Also, the widely reported collapse of private lending activities remain isolated, concentrated largely in Wenzhou city of Zhejiang and Eerduosi city of Inner Mongolia.

And third, balance sheets are still quite healthy for households, banks and the government — which should underwrite resilience even if the economic situation deteriorates. Total household borrowing is below 18 per cent of GDP, less than the value of households’ annual savings. If property prices decline modestly, households will not be forced to deleverage. And given the banks’ average non-performing loan ratio is at 2 per cent and the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) is at 21 per cent, some deterioration of credit quality is unlikely to make the banks dysfunctional in the near future. Finally, public debts are only 17 per cent of GDP in China. If all contingent liabilities are included, they could amount to nearly 70 per cent of GDP. But the government still has room to use fiscal resources to contain domestic risks and support economic growth.

So based on current trends, 2012 should see a soft landing in China. Affected by a sluggish external economic environment, export and import growth will likely halve to 9.8 per cent and 12.8 per cent, respectively. Reduction in net exports could reduce GDP by 0.4 percentage points. Of the three key components of fixed-asset investment, manufacturing investment is relatively more resilient and infrastructure is more or less a function of government policy. Uncertainty surrounds residential investment, which is likely to slow significantly in the coming year, following sharp adjustment in both property prices and transaction volumes. Despite this, residential investment should continue to grow in 2012 — albeit at a slower pace — due to large development projects, ongoing construction and the expansion of public housing.

Domestic consumption will be key to maintaining the economy, although the pace of its expansion should also moderate. In recent years, retail sales have consistently outperformed GDP. But the GDP-by-expenditure data continuously show declining consumption, due to reporting errors in household survey data, such as the under-reporting of income and household spending. Estimates combining information from both GDP by expenditure and retail sales suggest a turning point in 2007, after which consumption’s share of GDP actually picked up steadily. This is consistent with improvements in the social welfare system and a rapid growth of wage income in recent years.

The authorities have become vigilant against downside risks, evidenced by the recent adjustment of the reserve requirement ratio. But policy makers are concerned about a premature and aggressive easing of policies, given what might be considered ‘overstimulation’ three years ago. Four more cuts to the RRR and a slight increase in fiscal deficit can also be expected throughout 2012. The purpose of RRR adjustment is to stabilise liquidity conditions, instead of stimulating growth, given the steady slowing of China’s money supply. Although a cut to the policy interest rate is not predicted, the chance of rate cuts could rise significantly if the global economy falls into deeper recession or the correction of the housing market becomes disorderly.

Yiping Huang is Professor of Economics at Peking University and Professor at the China Economy Program, the Australian National University. He is also Chief Economist for Asia at Barclays Bank, Hong Kong.

  1. Russia and APEC 2012: imaginary engagement?
  2. Chinese leadership: The challenge in 2012
  3. India faces an ugly environment in 2009

Read the rest here:
China: will 2012 be a replay of 2009?

Asean

ASEAN weathering the COVID-19 typhoon

Published

on

Vietnam's Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc addresses a special video conference with leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in Hanoi 14 April, 2020 (Photo:Reuters/Manan Vatsyayana).

Author: Sandra Seno-Alday, Sydney University

The roughly 20 typhoons that hit Southeast Asia each year pale in comparison to the impact on the region of COVID-19 — a storm of a very different sort striking not just Southeast Asia but the world.

 

Just how badly is the COVID-19 typhoon thrashing the region? And what might the post-crisis recovery and reconstruction look like? To answer these questions, it is necessary to investigate the strengths and vulnerabilities of Southeast Asia’s pre-COVID-19 economic infrastructure.

Understanding the structure of the region’s economic house requires going back to 1967, when Southeast Asian countries decided to pledge friendship to one another under the ASEAN framework. While other integrated regions such as NAFTA and the European Union have aggressively broken down trade barriers and significantly boosted intra-regional trade, ASEAN regional economic integration has chugged along slower.

Southeast Asian countries have not viewed trade between each other as a top priority. The trade agreements in the region have been forged around suggestions for ASEAN countries to lower tariffs on intra-regional trade to within a certain range and across limited industries. This has lowered but not eliminated barriers to intra-regional trade. Consequently, a relatively significant share of Southeast Asian trade is with countries outside the region. This active extra-regional engagement has resulted in ASEAN countries’ successful integration into global value chain networks.

A historically outward-facing region, in 2010 around 75 per cent of Southeast Asian commodity imports and exports came from countries outside of ASEAN. This share of extra-regional trade nudged closer to 80 per cent in 2018. This indicates that ASEAN’s global value chain network embeddedness has deepened over time.

Around 40 per cent of ASEAN’s extra-regional trade is with the rest of Asia. From 2010 to 2018 Southeast Asian countries forged major trade relationships with four Asian countries: China, Japan, South Korea and India. Outside Asia, the United States is the region’s major trading partner. ASEAN’s trade focus on Asia’s largest markets is not surprising. Countries tend to establish trade relationships with large, geographically close, and culturally similar markets.

Fostering deep relationships with a few large markets, however, is a double-edged sword. While it has allowed ASEAN to benefit from integration in global value chains, it has also resulted in increased vulnerability to the shocks affecting its network connections.

ASEAN’s participation in global value chains has allowed it to transition from a net regional importer in 1990 to a net regional exporter in 2018. But the region’s deep embeddedness in a small and tightly-coupled network cluster of extra-regional global value chain partners has exposed it to disruption to any and all of its external partners. By contrast, ASEAN’s intra-regional trade network structure is much more loosely-coupled: a consequence of persistent intra-regional trade barriers and thus lower intra-regional trade intensity.

In the pre-COVID-19 period, ASEAN built for itself an economic house held up by just five extra-regional markets, while doing less to expand and diversify its intra-regional trade network. The data shows that ASEAN trade became increasingly concentrated in these few external markets between 2010 and 2018.

This dependence on a handful of markets does not bode well for risk and crisis management. All of the region’s major trading partners have been significantly affected by COVID-19 and this in turn is blowing the ASEAN economic house down.

What are the ways forward? The immediate task at hand is to get a better picture of the region’s position in global value chain networks and to get on top of managing its network risk exposure. Already there are red flags around the region’s food security arising from its position in food value chains. It is critical to look for ways to introduce flexibility into existing supply chains for greater agility in responding to crises.

It is also an opportune time for ASEAN to harness the technology transfer gains of global value chain participation and invest in innovation-driven diversification of products and markets. The region’s embeddedness in global value chain networks certainly places it in a strong position to readily access large export markets not just in Asia but also Europe and the Americas.

Over the longer term, ASEAN is faced with the question of whether it should seriously look…

Source link

Continue Reading

Markets

Tiger Trade Launches SGX Trading, Meeting Demand from Asian Investors

Access to the Singapore Exchange (SGX) adds to Tiger Brokers’ current menu of stock exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Nasdaq Stock Market (NASDAQ), the world’s two largest stock exchanges, as well as the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX).

Published

on

SINGAPORE (ACN Newswire) – Tiger Trade, a one-stop mobile and online trading application by Tiger Brokers, has launched access to the Singapore Exchange (SGX).

(more…)
Continue Reading

Asean

Can Asia maintain growth with an ever ageing population ?

To boost productivity in the future, Asian governments will have to implement well-targeted structural reforms today.

Published

on

Asia has been the world champion of economic growth for decades, and this year will be no exception. According to the latest International Monetary Fund Regional Economic Outlook(REO), the Asia-Pacific region’s GDP is projected to increase by 5.5% in 2017 and 5.4% in 2018. (more…)

Continue Reading